Go Back  RCU Forums > RC Airplanes > RC Jets
CARF Ultra Flash Evo build thread + >

CARF Ultra Flash Evo build thread +

Community
Search
Notices
RC Jets Discuss RC jets in this forum plus rc turbines and ducted fan power systems

CARF Ultra Flash Evo build thread +

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2023, 09:46 PM
  #601  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by essyou35
NOw that im looking, it may be closer to 10% cant empty not 20
Evo CARF tank? I can completely empty? Felt clunk pick up.
Old 05-07-2023, 09:51 PM
  #602  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camss69
Ok so I did some preliminary CG today… and I’m nose heavy.. Receiver batts and ECU batt will have to go back by the tank which is ok, just a little surprised since I have the 170 in it I was expecting to be more tail heavy.

I was happy to see I”m at 23.2lbs dry it sounds like that’s a pretty good weight.

It’s really light on the nose when the CG is correct with “landing fuel”, I read I think Dave posted that somewhere, but it’s only like 1/2 pound on the nose? Does that sound right for anyone using the Xicoy CG scales? Like without fuel in it, it might actually sit back on the tail, I didn’t try that though. I have the 4 liter tank and put one liter in as landing fuel.
JP gear?
Are you doing a manual balance or ‘variable’ electronic one? Depending on the equipment installed and layout, but I would guess batteries just in front of tank (rear of cockpit) would be a “normal” installation
Old 05-08-2023, 04:53 AM
  #603  
My Feedback: (46)
 
camss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,005
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
JP gear?
Are you doing a manual balance or ‘variable’ electronic one? Depending on the equipment installed and layout, but I would guess batteries just in front of tank (rear of cockpit) would be a “normal” installation
I’m using Electron gear and the Xicoy CG scales to balance which I’ve used many, many times. What do you mean by variable electronic one?



Old 05-08-2023, 07:52 AM
  #604  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

They just are not accurate​​​​​​. String method is 100% and repeatable.

Anyway Electron gear does not trail as much as designed for JP gear, so nose wheel will be lighter. Looking at the equipment you have I guess batteries along side tank makes sense.

Dave
The following users liked this post:
camss69 (05-08-2023)
Old 05-08-2023, 08:54 AM
  #605  
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Midwest
Posts: 1,948
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Whats a good felt clunk that fits in the hole, the GBR jets clunk I have doesnt fit
Old 05-08-2023, 11:25 AM
  #606  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

The one CARF do works fine
Old 05-08-2023, 01:22 PM
  #607  
My Feedback: (46)
 
camss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,005
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
They just are not accurate​​​​​​. String method is 100% and repeatable.

Anyway Electron gear does not trail as much as designed for JP gear, so nose wheel will be lighter. Looking at the equipment you have I guess batteries along side tank makes sense.

Dave
Can you do the string method with the single piece wing on the UF?
Old 05-08-2023, 01:38 PM
  #608  
My Feedback: (99)
 
AEROSHELDON's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Castle Rock CO
Posts: 1,550
Received 82 Likes on 66 Posts
Default








I could not figure out a string method so I did this. I would rather do string and now I have the 3 puck electronic one that is blue tooth.
Old 05-08-2023, 02:26 PM
  #609  
My Feedback: (1)
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: northridge, CA
Posts: 768
Received 113 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

I find weighing at each wheel, recording the measurement and calculating the CG to be consistent and accurate, using digital scales or the Xicoy device.


Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
They just are not accurate​​​​​​. String method is 100% and repeatable.

Anyway Electron gear does not trail as much as designed for JP gear, so nose wheel will be lighter. Looking at the equipment you have I guess batteries along side tank makes sense.

Dave
Old 05-08-2023, 09:06 PM
  #610  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camss69
Can you do the string method with the single piece wing on the UF?
Just lightly tape it across the wing surface on the balance point, put the wing on (just tighten enough to trap the string-cord) if you over tighten you will mark the wing surface, then lift….

Again 90% of jets the balance changes with fuel, so unless we all use measured volumes of fuel it’s a close point you are looking for.
Flying with your set up is the only way to perfect the balance required

D
Old 05-08-2023, 09:36 PM
  #611  
My Feedback: (46)
 
camss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,005
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
Just lightly tape it across the wing surface on the balance point, put the wing on (just tighten enough to trap the string-cord) if you over tighten you will mark the wing surface, then lift….

Again 90% of jets the balance changes with fuel, so unless we all use measured volumes of fuel it’s a close point you are looking for.
Flying with your set up is the only way to perfect the balance required

D
Or we all do like every other airplane category other than jets does and determine CG without the “landing fuel” fuel variable. If we all calculate CG with UAT full and main tank empty, we’re all starting from the same place.


Old 05-09-2023, 06:08 AM
  #612  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

You have an after market tank. Capacity won’t be the same
Old 05-09-2023, 07:39 AM
  #613  
My Feedback: (46)
 
camss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,005
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Dave Wilshere
You have an after market tank. Capacity won’t be the same
Exactly my point, taking the tank and landing fuel out of the equation.

Not trying to be argumentative here, just a discussion. Very much respect your skills and value your input on these threads.
Old 05-09-2023, 08:30 AM
  #614  
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 112
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I agree. Adding the variable of landing fuel brings in a subjective view point to an objective measurement. It would be best if we measured CG without fuel.
Old 05-09-2023, 09:15 AM
  #615  
My Feedback: (46)
 
camss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,005
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jvaliensi
I find weighing at each wheel, recording the measurement and calculating the CG to be consistent and accurate, using digital scales or the Xicoy device.
Agreed, I have had very consistent and repeatable results with the Xicoy scales. I’ve also done it with individual scales and the calculator. I’ve balanced a LOT of my own and club members planes with the Xicoy scales. Your measurements need to be precise to get accurate results so I spend a lot of time measuring.
Old 05-09-2023, 10:35 AM
  #616  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by camss69
Exactly my point, taking the tank and landing fuel out of the equation.

Not trying to be argumentative here, just a discussion. Very much respect your skills and value your input on these threads.
But we fly with fuel, and that will completely change the flight balance.

End of the day different pilots want different things. Lots of people like nose heavy set ups (it is why the CARF Viper manual balance is way forward-the designer likes nose heavy feel). It’s best to fly and adjust to suit what you like in feel.
Old 05-09-2023, 10:43 AM
  #617  
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Midwest
Posts: 1,948
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Hey Cams what RX do you use with your jets and your Jeti? Aeropanda recommended ex7 a40 Ill be using a powerbox pioneer.
Old 05-11-2023, 08:09 PM
  #618  
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Midwest
Posts: 1,948
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Well got a new radio so Im learning that before flying my flash.

Im reading, I had all my batteries up near the front gear, sounds like I need to move them rearward. I havent checked CG yet either but I think Ill mount my two RX batteries on the sides of the tank.
Old 05-11-2023, 08:30 PM
  #619  
My Feedback: (2)
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Ft.Lauderdale , FL
Posts: 743
Likes: 0
Received 52 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

When I had my Flash I had all the batteries into the nose, I never an issue with CG.
Old 05-11-2023, 08:41 PM
  #620  
My Feedback: (46)
 
camss69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Folsom, CA
Posts: 2,005
Received 69 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by essyou35
Hey Cams what RX do you use with your jets and your Jeti? Aeropanda recommended ex7 a40 Ill be using a powerbox pioneer.
I think I answered in the other thread.

Typically use CB 210 with REX7A as primary and R3 secondary. Just got a DS16 G2 so may add a 900 to my setups.
Old 05-15-2023, 07:53 PM
  #621  
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Midwest
Posts: 1,948
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Using the string method, Im 8.75" back from the leading edge on the top of the wing. Its the eyeball method as the wing is curved but its around there.
UAT full, tank with maybe 5% fuel.

Think Im ok?
Old 05-15-2023, 08:55 PM
  #622  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

You are going to be very nose heavy. Should be more like 9.25” with the canopy on.
Old 05-15-2023, 09:19 PM
  #623  
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Midwest
Posts: 1,948
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Ok I switched out my 3800 3s for a 2100 3s and its right on 9.25 now. That is the max rear value carf specifies.
Old 05-16-2023, 06:57 AM
  #624  
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Watford, UNITED KINGDOM
Posts: 13,112
Received 737 Likes on 532 Posts
Default

We do that for safety, but it’s where all my guys fly…
I wrote the manual 😉
The following users liked this post:
essyou35 (05-17-2023)
Old 05-17-2023, 05:21 PM
  #625  
My Feedback: (11)
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central Midwest
Posts: 1,948
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

I did a quick maiden on my jet today, flew 3 minutes then landed. I flew a little over 1/2 throttle on my k130 and it moves along ok, looking forward to opening it up.

kinda odd, it felt nose heavy but the elevator is twitchy. I have it set to the correct throw and I only had about 35% exp, Ill add some more to 50%. Very odd for a jet, thats 3d plane level expo there!

However I wonder if my issue is because I am using 1.25" servo arms? They are the hangar 9 1.5" arms but I am on the 1.25" hole. Could that be why? Myabe move down to 1"?

I could only get 3.25" on the flaps so Ill have to mess with the linkage to get more, but it still slows down nice with crow in it. No take off flaps. Maybe Ill just keep it this way. I could come in no power.


Contact Us - Manage Preferences Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.